A General Note about Sound Creation
CC8
Fall, 2004

Larry Polansky
10/8/04

(sent originally as an email to the class, prior to their second sound assignment)

I just wanted to send out a brief note on sound, its creation, and your role in it with regard to work in CC8. This is essentially a repeat of what I said in class, but I want to be extremely clear about it, and not leave any room for misinterpretation.

For the purposes of this class, you are responsible for creating sound (music/soundtrack/score, whatever you care to call it) at the same level of direct engagement that you are in animation. Selecting preexisting music is not an option, even if you mess with it a little. You are not curating, smapling, remixing, or dj-ing. You are  composing.

This can mean a lot of things (using short samples from other sources, and doing highly creative and original things with them is fine -- you've got to get raw sounds from somewhere), but it's important to realize that I'm going to reserve (and vigorously excercise) the right to be the final arbiter of what is original work and what is simply glorified downloading. I don't want the latter. You should be aware that I'm going to be quite sensitive to how much work you do on these scores, and how much of the final work is your doing and how much is someone else's. I'll be tough on this issue, so my friendly advice to you is to err on the side of doing-it-yourself. My yardstick might be expressed, perhaps, by what I said in the previous email: if a relationship to your source material would seem unnatural to you if it were, say, in the visual domain (like taking a South Park clip, recoloring it, and fitting it to your own music), it's innapropriate in the sound domain. To me, if it sounds like Avril Lavigne (in this class), it IS Avril Lavigne, and I don't want Avril Lavigne's work (not slowed down, not mixed with someone else's, not pitch-shifted, not flanged), but yours.

I understand that there are complicated philosophical and aesthetic argumentsn (heck, Brahms did it!), post-modern and not, for the use of found and prexistent entities in art, including irony, reference, recontextualization, etc. I'm fascinated by these art forms, and enjoy them and support them in many ways (frinstance, take a look at a little informal web-essay I wrote some years ago about these ideas in music, in an article called "Singing Together, Hacking Together, Plundering Together: Sonic Intellectual Property in Cybertimes"  at http://www.the-open-space.org/osonline/polansky/singing.html) -- but not in this class.

Sorry to sound so strict about this -- in general, I'm a ridiculously inclusive and open-minded artist and composition teacher. But for the purposes of this class, I'm trying to get you to do as much as you can for yourself, and I don't want to open up the "plundering", "sampling", or "curating" door even a little bit.

Thanks
lp